#Perpetual motion machine free#

What if a cheaply hacked together RunsALongTime9000 device was activated in the neighbourhood of a black hole or other gravitational anomaly? The seemingly obliterative punchline of a black hole complicates this, as does our difficulty in mapping out the play-by-play experience of being rended in one of these freaky space-blenders. not by perfecting the machine, but by situating it in circumstances different enough that 'the machine's perception of time' and/or our perception of its relationship to time could be manipulated or distorted to meet the letter of the request, if a bit disingenuously. I began to wonder if it might be possible to find a theoretical opportunity for a machine to be run for a timespan that is approaching/functionally equivalent to infinite. That being said, these issues are all elements of the material space side of the whole spacetime situation. Pretending that there isn't a flawgic gap there, another broader version of the same one-word answer is 'entropy.' 'Friction' is the simplest one-word answer, though you seem eager to simply discard it from your math without addressing how this would ever be done in reality. As the range of gravity is essentially infinite, it is impossible to completely isolate the machine from gravity and gravitational forces (Newtonian gravity). Not quite sure what you mean by 'would gravity matter'.

#Perpetual motion machine free#

Even space is not completely free of particles.ДЄlso, would gravity matter if friction wasn't in the equation? This requires the complete elimination of any and all forms of friction, which is not possible, even when operating in a vacuum (which in practice is never perfect). It is based on the idea that motion, once started, can continue forever. What you are describing is sometimes call a perpetual motion machine of the third kind. Would it be possible to create one if (for example) there was a wheel,ДЄnd it had a pushвЂ“ if it was frictionless, and in a vacuum, would it This machine violates the second law of thermodynamics.

There is also a perpetual motion machine of the second type, which is a machine that can operate in a cycle exchanging heat with only one temperature reservoir completely converting 100% of the heat into work. That's one of the reasons, and it applies to a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, a machine that can produce work without any energy input in violation of the first law (conservation of energy). So my question is why wouldn't it work? Why is it not perpetual? Certainly, the decay of magnetic properties of a magnet is not the only answer.Is the reason we don't have any perpetual motion machines because of The video demonstration is very short, and I strongly suspect that this motor would stop running after a certain amount of time, possibly a few minutes or hours. While this is true, I don't find this explanation satisfying, because if demagnetization over time was the only problem, then this machine could still probably run freely for months or years. I've been told that this machine could not be perpetual due to the fact that magnets lose their magnetism over time. Obviously, in the video, sounds and friction can be heard, so some energy exchange must be happening. Of course, I know that a perpetual motion machine could not exist due to the First Law of Thermodynamics, however, I've been struggling to find an explanation on why this particular motor seems to run so flawlessly. Here is a YouTube video demonstration of the motor in action:

I have been recently made aware of the following motor, which uses two magnets and a wheel to generate motion, and the creator of this machine claims that this motion is perpetual.